Read-only worked research
Reschedule a missed study session.
Start with the student's problem, make two prototypes, then try the task yourself.
- For
- University students preparing for high-stakes exams while managing changing schedules.
- Decision
- When a disrupted week removes planned study time, learners struggle to replan without sacrificing exam-critical review.
- Sessions
- 0 recorded
Author · The problem
A student falls behind.
A student misses a study session before their Statistics final. They need to rearrange the week without dropping the review that matters most.
Statistics final
Author · What to find out
Will the important review still happen?
The creator thinks a recovery planner will help students keep that review. Before making a prototype, they write down what would support that idea and what would count against it.
Statistics final
Learners will keep an exam-critical review protected when replanning competing work.
- Prediction
- At least four of five eligible learners protect an exam-critical review on a feasible new date without assistance.
- What would change your mind?
- Three or more eligible learners leave the plan unresolved, remove the critical review, or require assistance.
- Alternatives
- Learners may prefer a ranked backlog over placing a protected block on a calendar.
- Confidence before testing
- 70% before participant evidence
Show authored assumption questions
- What breaks when the week changes?
- The learner loses time but cannot tell which sessions must survive and which work can move.
Author · The prototypes
Try a calendar or a priority card.
One prototype lets students move the session on a calendar. The other puts the important review first in a card. Both test the same task.
Statistics final
Show model relationships and queries
- Commands
- protectExamReview, leaveCriticalReviewUnprotected
- Entities and fields
StudyPlan: examName, examOn, disrupted, protectedReviewOn, recoveryStatus
ReviewSession: planId, scheduledOn, protected
- Events
- examReviewProtected, criticalReviewDropped
- reviewSessionPlan
- ReviewSession.planId → StudyPlan (one)
- listStudyPlans
- StudyPlan
Show scenario definition
{
"records": {
"StudyPlan": [
{
"id": "example-studyus:scenario-record:StudyPlan:1",
"examName": "Statistics final",
"examOn": "2026-09-18",
"disrupted": true,
"protectedReviewOn": "2026-09-12",
"recoveryStatus": "needsReplan"
}
],
"ReviewSession": []
}
}Show authored model questions
- What action represents a credible recovery?
- The learner chooses a new feasible date and explicitly protects the exam-critical review.
Tester · Try the task
Take the student's place.
Choose a prototype and move the missed session to a new date. Does the important review stay in the plan? You can try this below.
Statistics final
A university learner with an exam inside two weeks whose original study week was disrupted.
Show screening and observation criteria
- Do you have an exam within two weeks and need to recover lost study time? (eligibility)
Support signal: examReviewProtected is recorded
Refute signal: criticalReviewDropped is recorded
Show authored prototype-test questions
- What should the prototype ask the learner to do?
- Recover one disrupted statistics plan while retaining a critical review on a concrete date.
Local simulation · not recorded
Author again · What happened
Check what happened.
In the example run, the review is kept on the new date. That's the action the creator planned to look for. They still need to test with real students before deciding whether the idea works.
Statistics final
No participant evidence yet.
Show authored learning question
- What did learners actually retain?
- No learner sessions have run; retention remains an untested prediction.
The example command supports the authored observation rule. It is a local, runnable demonstration—not participant evidence.